Перегляд за Автор "Lukianenko, Valentyna"

Зараз показуємо 1 - 3 з 3
  • Ескіз
    ДокументВідкритий доступ
    Application of CLIL methodology in teaching economic disciplines at university
    (Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, 2019) Kuzminska, Natalia; Stavytska, Iryna; Lukianenko, Valentyna; Lygina, Olga
  • Ескіз
    ДокументВідкритий доступ
    Enhancing manuscript quality: common mistakes and best practices for educational research papers
    (Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, 2024) Kornieva, Zoia; Lukianenko, Valentyna; Baklazhenko, Yuliia
    This editorial offers a comprehensive guide for researchers planning to publish in high-impact education journals. It identifies common pitfalls in manuscript submissions and provides practical recommendations to overcome them. The paper emphasizes the importance of aligning with a journal's aims and scope, adhering to submission guidelines, and effectively structuring the manuscript using the IMRAD model. It also addresses weaknesses in various manuscript sections and underlines the significance of citing up-todate sources, detailed methodological descriptions, ethical considerations, and a logical flow between sections. It concludes that respectful communication in response letters to reviewers significantly impacts the publication decision. Additionally, it offers valuable strategies to improve publication success in high-impact education journals.
  • Ескіз
    ДокументВідкритий доступ
    Research integrity in the age of ai: policies, practices, and challenges
    (Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, 2025) Kornieva, Zoia; Lukianenko, Valentyna; Baklazhenko, Yuliia
    This editorial addresses the evolving ethical challenges in scholarly publishing, particularly concerning artificial intelligence (AI), plagiarism, self-plagiarism, excessive self-citation, data fabrication, multiple submissions, and authorship practices. While AI can enhance research communication by refining language and improving efficiency, its misuse can affect transparency and accountability. Traditional threats, such as plagiarism, redundant publication, and citation manipulation, continue to weaken the credibility of research, while new risks are emerging from AI-generated content and fabricated findings. Drawing on guidance from COPE and major publishers, including Elsevier and Springer Nature, this article underscores the need for clear policies, transparent disclosure, and rigorous editorial review. It argues that research integrity depends on the shared responsibility of authors and editors, supported by both technological tools and critical human judgment. Preserving the credibility of scholarship requires not only firm measures against misconduct but also reinforcement of the core principles of integrity, transparency, validity, and accountability