Cognitive and Ontological Essence of Axiological Dominants and Principles of their Taxonomy in Diachronic and Synchronic Review

dc.contributor.authorStefanova, Nataliia
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-25T12:02:58Z
dc.date.available2022-05-25T12:02:58Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractenThe article provides a critical outline of elucidation of the cognitive and ontological essence of axiological dominants with the representatives of different cultures of language and a definition of the principles of their taxonomy in diachronic and synchronic review. The author makes a hypothesis that philosophical and axiological thoughts on this matter have not been homogeneous as in diachronic sense of its study (in particular, in the ancient world, the Middle Ages and Modern period etc.) so as in synchronic segment. It is proved that despite the ancient philosophers’ efforts such major value concepts as “Truth”, “Good”, “Beauty”, “Benefit” were left without clear understanding. Thus, they were not differentiated. The attempts of philosophical categorisation and conceptualisation remained to be undertaken by Renaissance scientists and thinkers. However, the notion “value” gets its philosophic status only in the Modern period, which was critical for the development of values taxonomy. The article argues that only after establishment of axiology as an independent philosophical doctrine it was possible to articulate four fundamental principles of the values structure: ontological, which makes it possible to explain scientifically the existential localisation of values and their correlation to human existence; gnoseological (or cognitive), with the help of which we experience values and necessity to study their correlation on the basis of both formalised principle, which is used for general rules of taxonomic hierarchy of values, and conceptual principle, which reveals the essence of values and determines their place in the defined hierarchy. The researcher introduces a new ethnosemiometric vector of axiological issues development directly within linguistics, which will enable to assess axiological dominants with the representatives of different cultures of language relying on the given values taxonomy and values hierarchy.uk
dc.format.pagerangePp. 225-230uk
dc.identifier.citationStefanova, N. Cognitive and Ontological Essence of Axiological Dominants and Principles of their Taxonomy in Diachronic and Synchronic Review / Nataliia Stefanova // Advanced education. – 2018. – Iss. 9. – Pp. 225-230uk
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.131680
dc.identifier.urihttps://ela.kpi.ua/handle/123456789/47562
dc.language.isoenuk
dc.publisherIgor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Instituteuk
dc.publisher.placeKyivuk
dc.sourceAdvanced education : збірник наукових праць, Вип. 9uk
dc.subjectaxiological dominantsuk
dc.subjectculture of languageuk
dc.subjectontological principleuk
dc.subjectcognitive principleuk
dc.subjectformalised principleuk
dc.subjectconceptual principleuk
dc.subjectethnosemiometryuk
dc.subjecttaxonomic hierarchy of valuesuk
dc.titleCognitive and Ontological Essence of Axiological Dominants and Principles of their Taxonomy in Diachronic and Synchronic Reviewuk
dc.typeArticleuk

Файли

Контейнер файлів
Зараз показуємо 1 - 1 з 1
Вантажиться...
Ескіз
Назва:
131680-Article Text-293601-1-10-20180704.pdf
Розмір:
1.2 MB
Формат:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Опис:
Ліцензійна угода
Зараз показуємо 1 - 1 з 1
Ескіз недоступний
Назва:
license.txt
Розмір:
9.1 KB
Формат:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Опис: